by erikdarlingdata · MCP Server · ★ 523
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 523 |
| Forks | 100 |
| Language | C# |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 67/100 |
| Open Issues | 149 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-22 |
| Created | 2026-02-11 |
| Platforms | aws, dotnet, mcp |
| Est. Tokens | ~28k |
SQL Server Performance Monitor <img src="https://img.shields.io/github/actions/workflow/st
Looking for a PerformanceMonitor alternative? If you're comparing PerformanceMonitor with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
🐘 Give AI assistants full PostgreSQL DBA superpowers — 30+ tools for performance analysis, bloat detection, l
MCP server and Claude plugin for Postgres skills and documentation. Helps AI coding tools generate better Post
An MCP server to query any Postgres database in natural language.
Query robotics, drone, and IoT data in plain English through an MCP server, with an intelligent edge data redu
Open-source persistent memory for AI agent pipelines (LangGraph, CrewAI, AutoGen) and Claude. REST API + knowl
An MCP client for Neovim that seamlessly integrates MCP servers into your editing workflow with an intuitive i
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: