by executeautomation · MCP Server · ★ 5.6k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
Featured in: browser-use, Playwright MCP & AI Browser Agents
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 5,647 |
| Forks | 539 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 72/100 |
| Open Issues | 37 |
| Last Updated | 2025-12-13 |
| Created | 2024-12-03 |
| Platforms | browser, claude-code, cli, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~1977k |
MseeP.ai Security Assessment Playwright MCP Server 🎭 A Model Context Protocol server that provides browser automation capabilities using Playwright. This server enables LLMs to interact with web pages, take screenshots, generate test code, web scrapes the page and execute JavaScript in a real browser environment.
Looking for a mcp-playwright alternative? If you're comparing mcp-playwright with other mcp server tools, these 3 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
AI Agents & MCPs & AI Workflow Automation • (~400 MCP servers for AI agents) • AI Automation / AI Agent with M
🔥 MaxKB is an open-source platform for building enterprise-grade agents. 强大易用的开源企业级智能体平台。
This open-source curriculum introduces the fundamentals of Model Context Protocol (MCP) through real-world, cr
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: