No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
by TencentCloud · Agent Tool · ★ 12.5k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
🔒 Is CubeSandbox safe to install? View the security audit →
CubeSandbox Instant, Concurrent, Secure & Lightweight Sandbox Service for AI Agents <img src="https:
| Stars | 12,514 |
| Forks | 1,122 |
| Language | Go |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| Quality Score | 56.9809538701149/100 |
| Open Issues | 142 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-15 |
| Created | 2026-04-10 |
| Platforms | go |
| Est. Tokens | ~20k |
These tools work well together with CubeSandbox for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a CubeSandbox alternative? If you're comparing CubeSandbox with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
:robot: The free, Open Source alternative to OpenAI, Claude and others. Self-hosted and local-first. Drop-in r
AI Data Vault - A query engine for AI Agents to securely query data from any datasource
🚀 The fast, Pythonic way to build MCP servers and clients.
Personal memory across agents
A collection of projects showcasing RAG, agents, workflows, and other AI use cases
ValueCell is a community-driven, multi-agent platform for financial applications.
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
CubeSandbox is Instant, Concurrent, Secure & Lightweight Sandbox for AI Agents.. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 12.5k GitHub stars.
CubeSandbox is primarily written in Go. It covers topics such as agents, container, sandbox.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the CubeSandbox GitHub repository at github.com/TencentCloud/CubeSandbox. The project has 12.5k stars and 1122 forks, indicating an active community.
The top alternatives to CubeSandbox on Agent Skills Hub include LocalAI, mindsdb, fastmcp. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: