literature-report-ppt-builder — security grade SAFE, quality 65/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 65/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by fangyuanopus · Codex Skill · ★ 110

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is literature-report-ppt-builder safe to install? View the security audit →

About literature-report-ppt-builder

academic-slide-minimalist 把论文和补充信息读透,再生成一套能讲清楚证据链的中文文献汇报 PPT。 English | 中文 是一个面向 Claude Code / Codex 的学术 PPT skill。它适合论文组会、journal club、课程文献汇报、硕博答辩预汇报等场景:先做 close reading、证据链梳理、真实图源清单和页面规划,再用 image-first 方式生成稳定的 16:9 PPT 页面。 它的核心原则很简单:清楚先于好看,真实先于炫酷。 效果演示 下面的页面来自仓库内置样例 ,用于展示 skill 追求的页面组织方式:真实论文图、清晰结论句、红黑灰学术风格、导航一致、证据链可讲。 这个 skill 解决什么问题 很多 AI PPT 工具能把页面做得好看,但学术汇报最容易翻车的地方不是配色,而是: 没读懂论文主线,只是按 Figure 1、Figure 2 顺序堆图; 用了“看起来像实验图”的假图或重绘图,科学内容不可信; 页面标题是主题词,不是结论句,汇报时讲不出核心观点; 结果部分全部塞进“研究结果”,老师听不出证据层次; PPT 页面单独生成,导航、页码、标题尺度和图注风格不一致; 汇报完成后缺少 backup、问答准备和可追溯的图源记录。 的目标是反过来做:先保证论文逻辑、图源和证据强度正确,再追求页面美观。 核心能力 论文到 PPT 的完整工作流 从 main paper + supplementary information 出发,按固定顺序生成汇报结构: text close reading

academic-presentationcodex-skillliterature-reviewpptx

Quick Facts

Stars110
Forks4
LanguagePython
CategoryCodex Skill
LicenseMIT
Quality Score65.0986853182318/100
Open Issues3
Last Updated2026-07-11
Created2026-05-19
Platformscodex, python
Est. Tokens~15k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with literature-report-ppt-builder for enhanced workflows:

literature-report-ppt-builder alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a literature-report-ppt-builder alternative? If you're comparing literature-report-ppt-builder with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • xiaobei-skill by xiao24bei · ⭐ 196

    小北在读研开源 Codex Skills 合集:Image to VBA、Academic Paper to PPT 等 AI + 科研工作流。

  • medsci-skills by Aperivue · ⭐ 324

    Agent Skills for medical research — literature search, reporting-guideline & citation checks, statistics, publ

  • Mck-ppt-design-skill by likaku · ⭐ 293

    Consulting firm-style PowerPoint design system for AI agents. 70 layout patterns, flat design, python-pptx. 麦麸

  • De-Anthropocentric-Research-Engine by Pthahnix · ⭐ 229

    De-Anthropocentric Research Engine — AI-powered academic research automation with deep literature survey, gap

  • Aut_Sci_Write by ShZhao27208 · ⭐ 180

    Academic research skills suite for AI Agent — literature search/download (WoS+Elsevier+Springer), PDF extrac

  • Codex-Academic-Skills by Epsilon617 · ⭐ 168

    A curated list of research-oriented skills usable in OpenAI Codex, covering writing, literature review, evalua

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is literature-report-ppt-builder?

literature-report-ppt-builder is Open-source Codex skill for academic literature-report PPT generation. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 110 GitHub stars.

What programming language is literature-report-ppt-builder written in?

literature-report-ppt-builder is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as academic-presentation, codex-skill, literature-review.

How do I install or use literature-report-ppt-builder?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the literature-report-ppt-builder GitHub repository at github.com/fangyuanopus/literature-report-ppt-builder. The project has 110 stars and 4 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does literature-report-ppt-builder use?

literature-report-ppt-builder is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to literature-report-ppt-builder?

The top alternatives to literature-report-ppt-builder on Agent Skills Hub include xiaobei-skill, medsci-skills, Mck-ppt-design-skill. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools