AI-Powered-Literature-Review-Skills — security grade SAFE, quality 66/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 66/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by stephenlzc · Agent Tool · ★ 139

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is AI-Powered-Literature-Review-Skills safe to install? View the security audit →

About AI-Powered-Literature-Review-Skills

Literature Reviewer Skill 中文(主文档) | English ⚠️ 安全提示: 本 Skill 依赖 browser skill 进行浏览器自动化,将访问浏览器 cookies 和登录状态。建议在隔离环境(如 Docker)中运行。详见 SECURITY.md 系统性学术文献回顾(Literature Survey)Skill for Kimi CLI 采用 8阶段工作流,浏览器自动化检索,支持 CNKI/WOS/ScienceDirect,零配置输出 GB/T 7714-2015 格式文献综述 📖 简介 Literature Survey Skill 是一个为 Kimi CLI 设计的 Skill 插件,用于帮助用户进行系统性的学术文献回顾。 核心优势 🚀 8阶段工作流:从查询分析到综述生成的完整流程 🌐 浏览器自动化:无需API配置,直接访问学术数据库 ✅ 多数据库支持:CNKI、Web of Science、ScienceDirect、PubMed 📚 结构化输出:GB/T 7714-2015引文 + 标题 + 摘要的Markdown文档 🔄 中断续传:支持会话保存和恢复 ✨ 功能特性 ✅

academic-papersacademic-researchai-agentbibliographycitationkimi-skillliterature-reviewpythonresearch-tools

Quick Facts

Stars139
Forks18
LanguagePython
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseMIT
Quality Score66.1798910234957/100
Last Updated2026-09-07
Created2026-03-05
Platformspython
Est. Tokens~17k

AI-Powered-Literature-Review-Skills alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a AI-Powered-Literature-Review-Skills alternative? If you're comparing AI-Powered-Literature-Review-Skills with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • De-Anthropocentric-Research-Engine by Pthahnix · ⭐ 229

    De-Anthropocentric Research Engine — AI-powered academic research automation with deep literature survey, gap

  • cli-anything-zotero by PiaoyangGuohai1 · ⭐ 122

    CLI server for Zotero 7/8/9 — let AI manage your library. 70+ CLI commands for search, import, PDF, BibTeX, no

  • bibverify by Hylouis233 · ⭐ 101

    Cross-platform BibTeX verification for researchers and AI assistants — CLI, Python API, MCP server, and explai

  • seerai by dralkh · ⭐ 74

    Zotero AI plugin Research assistant for Zotero 9. Chat with your library, run federated scholarly search, RAG,

  • OneCite by HzaCode · ⭐ 64

    📚 Only Cite what you can verify

  • AlterLab-Academic-Skills by AlterLab-IEU · ⭐ 63

    239 evaluated academic Claude/agent skills across 17 research domains (bioinformatics, data science, clinical,

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is AI-Powered-Literature-Review-Skills?

AI-Powered-Literature-Review-Skills is AI驱动的系统性学术文献回顾工具 | AI-Powered Literature Survey Tool with 8-Phase Workflow & Agent Swarm Architecture. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 139 GitHub stars.

What programming language is AI-Powered-Literature-Review-Skills written in?

AI-Powered-Literature-Review-Skills is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as academic-papers, academic-research, ai-agent.

How do I install or use AI-Powered-Literature-Review-Skills?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the AI-Powered-Literature-Review-Skills GitHub repository at github.com/stephenlzc/AI-Powered-Literature-Review-Skills. The project has 139 stars and 18 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does AI-Powered-Literature-Review-Skills use?

AI-Powered-Literature-Review-Skills is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to AI-Powered-Literature-Review-Skills?

The top alternatives to AI-Powered-Literature-Review-Skills on Agent Skills Hub include De-Anthropocentric-Research-Engine, cli-anything-zotero, bibverify. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools