simple-jev — security grade SAFE, quality 59/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 59/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by featherless-ai · AI Tool · ★ 348

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is simple-jev safe to install? View the security audit →

About simple-jev

Simple Jev Project Use compatible open models from huggingface, for structured classification and scoring, without training a separate classifier head. Explore the demos, playground, and documentation at simple-jev.featherless.ai. Send shared context and a set of questions. Simple Jev reads the model's next-token logits for each question and builds a JSON response containing choices, rubric scores, or truth/support judgments. The model does not generate a JSON completion: the server constructs the response from the scores. The current implementation runs locally with Hugging Face Transformers and PyTorch. Shared request validation, versioned prompt instructions, and response scoring live in the plain Python folder so other inference implementations can use the same rules. Try it today Try the public demo API with no login, API key, or authentication required. The demo has a 2k-token context limit and is rate limited to 2 requests per second (2 RPS). First, list the available models with : The demo already serves Gemma as . Try it directly with , or use another model ID returned by the list: bash curl https://simple-jev-demo-api.featherless.ai/v1

Quick Facts

Stars348
Forks36
LanguagePython
CategoryAI Tool
Quality Score58.8666261337878/100
Open Issues2
Last Updated2026-09-20
Created2026-09-18
Platformspython
Est. Tokens~17k

simple-jev alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a simple-jev alternative? If you're comparing simple-jev with other ai tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • perf-map-agent by jvm-profiling-tools · ⭐ 1.7k

    A java agent to generate method mappings to use with the linux `perf` tool

  • shaping-skills by rjs · ⭐ 1.4k

    Skills I use with Claude for shaping

  • pivotnacci by blackarrowsec · ⭐ 725

    A tool to make socks connections through HTTP agents

  • MedgeClaw by xjtulyc · ⭐ 668

    Open-source AI research assistant for biomedicine — chat to run RNA-seq, drug discovery, clinical analysis, an

  • SciToolAgent by HICAI-ZJU · ⭐ 416

    SciToolAgent: A Knowledge Graph-Driven Scientific Agent for Multi-Tool Integration

  • redesigned-pancake by Sfedfcv · ⭐ 256

    Skip to content github / docs Code Issues 80 Pull requests 35 Discussions Actions Projects 2 Security Insights

More AI Tool Tools

Explore other popular ai tool tools:

View all AI Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is simple-jev?

simple-jev is Turn any open model into a classifier/jev endpoint. It is categorized as a AI Tool with 348 GitHub stars.

What programming language is simple-jev written in?

simple-jev is primarily written in Python.

How do I install or use simple-jev?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the simple-jev GitHub repository at github.com/featherless-ai/simple-jev. The project has 348 stars and 36 forks, indicating an active community.

What are the best alternatives to simple-jev?

The top alternatives to simple-jev on Agent Skills Hub include perf-map-agent, shaping-skills, pivotnacci. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse AI Tool tools