by feiskyer · Agent Tool · ★ 85
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 85 |
| Forks | 21 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 66/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2024-01-31 |
| Created | 2023-02-13 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~14k |
ChatGPT-Reviewer Automated pull requests reviewing and issues triaging with ChatGPT. How to use Create an OpenAI API key here, and then set the key as an action secret in your repository named . Finally, create a file named with the following contents: Configurations |freque
Looking for a ChatGPT-Reviewer alternative? If you're comparing ChatGPT-Reviewer with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Context-aware AI reviewer for Pull Requests. Instant summary, line-by-line comments, title generation and more
Python version of 📦 repopack (https://github.com/yamadashy/repopack) by yamadashy (https://github.com/yamadas
Home Assistant add-on: Claude Code, OpenAI/GPT, Gemini
CLI tool that generates commit messages from git changes, reviews code for quality issues, and provides debugg
Claude Code harness engineering plugin — plan mode on steroids. Product design-driven agent orchestration with
✨Lightweight LLM Client with MCP 🔌 & Characters 👤
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: