typesafe-mario — security grade SAFE, quality 63/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 63/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by fhshaik · AI Tool · ★ 293

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is typesafe-mario safe to install? View the security audit →

About typesafe-mario

TypeSafe Mario An experimental controller that lets TypeSafe's Jev model directly choose NES controller inputs for the original Super Mario Bros. The model does not receive screenshots. The harness translates emulator telemetry and RAM into compact, object-centric JSON containing Mario's motion, jump trajectory, upcoming enemies, terrain, measured response delay, recent-control results, and episode progress. Jev chooses one of the legal controller actions, the emulator advances several frames, and the loop repeats. The raw local tile grid remains available in debug logs and the UI, but is not duplicated in the model input. Architecture The initial action set is intentionally small: Requirements Python 3.13 or newer A TypeSafe API key in A legal local setup for Super Mario Bros. This repository contains no Nintendo ROM or other copyrighted game data. You are responsible for ensuring that your emulator and game files are obtained and used lawfully. Setup Inspect the exact JSON and text that will be sent to TypeSafe without launching the game or calling the API: powershell .venv\Scripts\typesafe-mario state-demo

Quick Facts

Stars293
Forks28
LanguagePython
CategoryAI Tool
Quality Score62.6393797429849/100
Open Issues1
Last Updated2026-09-16
Created2026-09-16
Platformspython
Est. Tokens~2k

typesafe-mario alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a typesafe-mario alternative? If you're comparing typesafe-mario with other ai tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • shaping-skills by rjs · ⭐ 1.4k

    Skills I use with Claude for shaping

  • pivotnacci by blackarrowsec · ⭐ 725

    A tool to make socks connections through HTTP agents

  • MedgeClaw by xjtulyc · ⭐ 668

    Open-source AI research assistant for biomedicine — chat to run RNA-seq, drug discovery, clinical analysis, an

  • SciToolAgent by HICAI-ZJU · ⭐ 416

    SciToolAgent: A Knowledge Graph-Driven Scientific Agent for Multi-Tool Integration

  • redesigned-pancake by Sfedfcv · ⭐ 256

    Skip to content github / docs Code Issues 80 Pull requests 35 Discussions Actions Projects 2 Security Insights

  • claude-code-voice-skill by abracadabra50 · ⭐ 169

    Skill to talk to Claude about your projects over the phone

More AI Tool Tools

Explore other popular ai tool tools:

View all AI Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is typesafe-mario?

typesafe-mario is A TypeSafe/Jev agent that plays Super Mario Bros. from structured emulator state.. It is categorized as a AI Tool with 293 GitHub stars.

What programming language is typesafe-mario written in?

typesafe-mario is primarily written in Python.

How do I install or use typesafe-mario?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the typesafe-mario GitHub repository at github.com/fhshaik/typesafe-mario. The project has 293 stars and 28 forks, indicating an active community.

What are the best alternatives to typesafe-mario?

The top alternatives to typesafe-mario on Agent Skills Hub include shaping-skills, pivotnacci, MedgeClaw. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse AI Tool tools