lamda — security grade SAFE, quality 57/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 57/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by firerpa · MCP Server · ★ 8.3k

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is lamda safe to install? View the security audit →

About lamda

FIRERPA Android | AI-Powered Automation An all-in-one next-gen Android automation framework blending robust on-device services with AI-ready agents and extensible tool-calling capabilities. Documentation llms-full.txt Core Capabilities FIRERPA is a lightweight, on-device Android automation stack with no external dependencies. It unifies low-latency remote desktop with 160+ APIs for device discovery/status/logs, system and app control, UI automation, OCR/image matching, file I/O, storage, scheduling, and shell execution, plus distributed deployment via Hub/FRP/OpenVPN. Built-in ADB/SSH/SCP,

adbagentsaiandroidappiumautomationdynamic-analysisfridamagiskmcp

Quick Facts

Stars8,258
Forks1,109
LanguagePython
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score56.961593844762/100
Open Issues41
Last Updated2026-08-30
Created2022-07-10
Platformsbrowser, cli, mcp, python
Est. Tokens~14k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with lamda for enhanced workflows:

  • app-use — semantic(0.39)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+shared_platform (53%)
  • areclaw — semantic(0.48)+complementary+rare_topics (52%)
  • apktool-mcp-server — semantic(0.56)+rare_topics+same_lang+shared_platform (49%)

lamda alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a lamda alternative? If you're comparing lamda with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • jadx-ai-mcp by zinja-coder · ⭐ 2.7k

    Plugin for JADX to integrate MCP server

  • gpt-researcher by assafelovic · ⭐ 29.2k

    An autonomous agent that conducts deep research on any data using any LLM providers

  • trigger.dev by triggerdotdev · ⭐ 16.4k

    Trigger.dev – build and deploy durable AI agents and workflows

  • ida-pro-mcp by mrexodia · ⭐ 12.2k

    AI-powered reverse engineering assistant that bridges IDA Pro with language models through MCP.

  • hexstrike-ai by 0x4m4 · ⭐ 11.1k

    HexStrike AI MCP Agents is an advanced MCP server that lets AI agents (Claude, GPT, Copilot, etc.) autonomousl

  • bytebot by bytebot-ai · ⭐ 11.1k

    Bytebot is a self-hosted AI desktop agent that automates computer tasks through natural language commands, ope

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is lamda?

lamda is Android Full-Stack Device Control Platform: WebRTC/H.264 remote desktop, UI/OCR/image-matching automation, one-click MITM, built-in Frida, proxy/VPN/frp/P2P networking, MCP/Agent, 160+ APIs, designed . It is categorized as a MCP Server with 8.3k GitHub stars.

What programming language is lamda written in?

lamda is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as adb, agents, ai.

How do I install or use lamda?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the lamda GitHub repository at github.com/firerpa/lamda. The project has 8.3k stars and 1109 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does lamda use?

lamda is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to lamda?

The top alternatives to lamda on Agent Skills Hub include jadx-ai-mcp, gpt-researcher, trigger.dev. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools