by flows-network · LLM Plugin · ★ 230
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 230 |
| Forks | 64 |
| Language | Rust |
| Category | LLM Plugin |
| Quality Score | 59/100 |
| Last Updated | 2024-08-05 |
| Created | 2023-03-27 |
| Platforms | rust |
| Est. Tokens | ~24k |
Agent to summarize Github PRs Deploy this function on flows.network, and you will get an AI agent to review and summarize GitHub Pull Requests. It helps busy open source contributors understand and make decisions on PRs faster! Here are some examples.
Looking for a github-pr-summary alternative? If you're comparing github-pr-summary with other llm plugin tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
An AI-powered GitHub code review tool that uses LLMs to detect high-confidence, high-impact issues—such as sec
Official Implementation of Dynamic LLM-Agent Network: An LLM-agent Collaboration Framework with Agent Team Opt
Official remote MCP server for Atlassian. Securely connect Jira, Confluence, Jira Service Management, Bitbucke
Empower Large Language Models (LLM) using Knowledge Graph based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (KG-RAG) for kn
MCP server for semantic code research and context generation on real-time using LLM patterns | Search naturall
Shell and coding agent on mcp clients
Explore other popular llm plugin tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: