by godagoo · Agent Tool · ★ 6
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 6 |
| Forks | 2 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 69/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-08-25 |
| Created | 2026-08-25 |
| Platforms | claude-code, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~7k |
Measure and stop structural erosion in AI-written TypeScript. Slop Check finds the mess, the Deslop tools clean it. Based on SlopCodeBench (arXiv:2603.24755).
Looking for a slopcheck-deslop alternative? If you're comparing slopcheck-deslop with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
AI-powered code quality analysis using MCP to help AI assistants review code more effectively. Analyze git cha
🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace
htop for your AI costs — real-time terminal monitoring of LLM token usage and spending across providers and co
humanizer, but for code — an agent skill that removes AI-generated code slop: duplicated helpers, try-import f
Skills for AI coding agents — Laravel, PHP, React, TypeScript, testing, security, and code quality.
Stop "vibe coding" and start Stream Coding, the 10-20x velocity methodology for AI-accelerated development. In
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: