CodexPool — security grade SAFE, quality 61/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 61/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by heyuqiu2023 · Codex Skill · ★ 327

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is CodexPool safe to install? View the security audit →

About CodexPool

🦞 小龙虾 — Codex 账号池管理器 多账号 Codex 管理仪表板,支持 GPT / Gemini / Claude 等多平台账号,实时监控用量、自动轮换,一键登录新账号。 Originally designed for OpenAI Codex, but works with any platform using ChatGPT OAuth tokens. ✨ Features 平台分类 — 支持 GPT、Gemini、Claude 等多平台账号,可自定义添加新平台 一键登录 — 在界面内直接完成 OAuth 授权,auth 文件自动保存 批量用量检测 — 一键检测所有账号的 5h 窗口用量,结果实时展示在各账号卡片 自动轮换 — 用量超过阈值时自动切换到下一个可用账号 亮暗主题 — 支持深色 / 浅色模式随时切换 紧凑列表视图 — 网格视图和紧凑列表视图自由切换 实时日志 — 完整记录轮换事件、Token 刷新、用量

account-managementchatgptcodexopenaiopenclaw-plugin

Quick Facts

Stars327
Forks69
LanguageTypeScript
CategoryCodex Skill
LicenseMIT
Quality Score61.498225440336/100
Open Issues2
Last Updated2026-05-17
Created2026-03-20
Platformscodex, node
Est. Tokens~69k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with CodexPool for enhanced workflows:

  • codexia — semantic(0.34)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (57%)
  • code-container — semantic(0.15)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (55%)
  • sagittarius — semantic(0.21)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (52%)
  • universal-db-mcp — semantic(0.16)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (51%)

CodexPool alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a CodexPool alternative? If you're comparing CodexPool with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • codexia by milisp · ⭐ 915

    Lightweight Agent Workstation for Codex CLI + Claude Code — with task scheduler, git worktree & remote control

  • paperdebugger by PaperDebugger · ⭐ 1.5k

    A Plugin-Based Multi-Agent System for In-Editor Academic Writing, Review, and Editing

  • sre by SmythOS · ⭐ 1.3k

    The SmythOS Runtime Environment (SRE) is an open-source, cloud-native runtime for agentic AI. Secure, modular,

  • wcgw by rusiaaman · ⭐ 674

    Shell and coding agent on mcp clients

  • desktop by agentify-sh · ⭐ 511

    Agentify Desktop lets Codex/Claude/OpenCode control your logged-in ChatGPT, Claude, AiStudio, Gemini, Grok, P

  • daan by pluveto · ⭐ 284

    ✨Lightweight LLM Client with MCP 🔌 & Characters 👤

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular TypeScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is CodexPool?

CodexPool is 有啥问题抖音私我,我后面攒起来更新. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 327 GitHub stars.

What programming language is CodexPool written in?

CodexPool is primarily written in TypeScript. It covers topics such as account-management, chatgpt, codex.

How do I install or use CodexPool?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the CodexPool GitHub repository at github.com/heyuqiu2023/CodexPool. The project has 327 stars and 69 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does CodexPool use?

CodexPool is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to CodexPool?

The top alternatives to CodexPool on Agent Skills Hub include codexia, paperdebugger, sre. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools