by PaperDebugger · MCP Server · ★ 1.5k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 43 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 43 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 1,540 |
| Forks | 73 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | AGPL-3.0 |
| Quality Score | 63/100 |
| Open Issues | 16 |
| Last Updated | 2026-07-03 |
| Created | 2025-04-12 |
| Platforms | cli, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~15k |
PaperDebugger is an AI-powered academic writing assistant that helps researchers debug a
These tools work well together with paperdebugger for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a paperdebugger alternative? If you're comparing paperdebugger with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Enterprise AI Platform with guardrails, MCP registry, gateway & orchestrator
Shell and coding agent on mcp clients
Lightweight Agent Workstation for Codex + Claude code + keke-agent — with dots, task scheduler, git worktree &
Ultimate Context Engineering Infrastructure, starting from MCPs and Integrations
An MCP Multimodal AI Agent with eyes and ears!
Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that lets AI assistants read Overleaf projects, parse LaTeX document struc
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 43 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: