llm-agent-audit — security grade SAFE, quality 67/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 67/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by hugoii · Agent Tool · ★ 62

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is llm-agent-audit safe to install? View the security audit →

About llm-agent-audit

Action-boundary audits for tool-using AI agents I test whether untrusted content, such as a user message, ticket, email, document, call transcript, or tool response, can push your tool-using AI agent into a high-impact action it should not take: issuing a refund, moving money, changing a vendor's bank account, deleting an account, granting access, disabling MFA, dispatching a job, or exporting data. Want the scenarios I would test for your agent? Email me actionboundary.dev How it works. Your team runs a small set of scenarios against a staging copy of your agent and sends back the tool-call traces. You get an OWASP-mapped report with the evidence and concrete fixes. No production access, no real customer data, no shared credentials. Why it is different. Most AI testing checks what the model says. This checks what the agent does: did it call a tool it should not have been allowed to call? Pass or fail comes from the agent's actual tool-call trace, not from string-matching its re

access-controlagent-securityai-agentsauthorizationllm-securitypayment-securitysecurity-reviewtransaction-authorization

Quick Facts

Stars62
Forks9
LanguagePython
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseMIT
Quality Score66.512277186913/100
Last Updated2026-07-10
Created2026-06-04
Platformspython
Est. Tokens~15k

llm-agent-audit alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a llm-agent-audit alternative? If you're comparing llm-agent-audit with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • tenuo by tenuo-ai · ⭐ 92

    Task-scoped authorization for AI agents. Cryptographic warrants constrain tools and arguments, prevent privile

  • OctoBus by chaitin · ⭐ 201

    A secure local gateway for AI agents to reliably call approved enterprise APIs, tools, and services.

  • agentseal by AgentSeal · ⭐ 156

    Security toolkit for AI agents. Scan your machine for dangerous skills and MCP configs, monitor for supply cha

  • compliant-llm by fiddlecube · ⭐ 162

    Build Secure and Compliant AI agents and MCP Servers. YC W23

  • deliberation by antonbabenko · ⭐ 161

    Ask Codex, Gemini, Grok, and 400+ OpenRouter models (Qwen, Kimi, DeepSeek) for second opinions or arbiter-medi

  • template-repo by AndrewAltimit · ⭐ 131

    Agent orchestration & security template featuring MCP tool building, agent2agent workflows, mechanistic interp

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is llm-agent-audit?

llm-agent-audit is Trace-backed Agent Authorization Reviews for tool-using AI agents. Staging-only evidence for payment, record-change, access, and export actions.. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 62 GitHub stars.

What programming language is llm-agent-audit written in?

llm-agent-audit is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as access-control, agent-security, ai-agents.

How do I install or use llm-agent-audit?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the llm-agent-audit GitHub repository at github.com/hugoii/llm-agent-audit. The project has 62 stars and 9 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does llm-agent-audit use?

llm-agent-audit is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to llm-agent-audit?

The top alternatives to llm-agent-audit on Agent Skills Hub include tenuo, OctoBus, agentseal. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools