ppt-image-rebuilder: what it is & alternatives

by huhuhu301 · Codex Skill · ★ 6

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is ppt-image-rebuilder safe to install? View the security audit →

About ppt-image-rebuilder

Codex plugin for rebuilding reference images as editable native PowerPoint slides, developed by the BDSmart Artificial Intelligence Group.

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 57/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

Quick Facts

Stars6
Forks0
LanguageJavaScript
CategoryCodex Skill
LicenseMIT
Quality Score56.7766148837052/100
Last Updated2026-08-01
Created2026-08-01
Platformscodex, node
Est. Tokens~13k

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular JavaScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is ppt-image-rebuilder?

ppt-image-rebuilder is Codex plugin for rebuilding reference images as editable native PowerPoint slides, developed by the BDSmart Artificial Intelligence Group.. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 6 GitHub stars.

What programming language is ppt-image-rebuilder written in?

ppt-image-rebuilder is primarily written in JavaScript.

How do I install or use ppt-image-rebuilder?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the ppt-image-rebuilder GitHub repository at github.com/huhuhu301/ppt-image-rebuilder. The project has 6 stars and 0 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does ppt-image-rebuilder use?

ppt-image-rebuilder is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools