by intikhab49 · Agent Tool · ★ 50
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 50 |
| Forks | 4 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 65/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-06 |
| Created | 2026-09-19 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~17k |
Open Jev — a typed decision engine you can train for free A 150M encoder that answers arbitrary typed questions about a state in one forward pass, with calibrated confidence. 0.03 behind TypeSafe Jev on its own benchmark, 2.5× better calibrated, 4× faster, $0.
These tools work well together with open-jev-typed-decision-engine for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a open-jev-typed-decision-engine alternative? If you're comparing open-jev-typed-decision-engine with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
JevStyle: local decision models for AI agents. Classify, route and score with a probability per option. system
Non-autoregressive decision engine on ModernBERT (151M) with calibrated uncertainty (RLCD), TypeSafe AI Jev be
JevK5: open-weight alternative to TypeSafe Jev. Typed decisions with probabilities in one forward pass; Apache
🔥🔥 Papers, open reproductions and independent evaluations behind System One models and Jev.
The pipe layer of an AI nervous system — one interface connecting provider neurons to your application, across
Typed-decision models (noul / choice / score) trained by a self-improving loop of AI agents — checkpoints, the
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: