value-for-fable — Agent Tool by itsinseong

by itsinseong · Agent Tool · ★ 180

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

About value-for-fable

𝐕𝐚𝐥𝐮𝐞-𝐟𝐨𝐫-𝐅𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 (𝐕𝐅𝐅) 주인장 시험기간 ( 시험끝나고 더 봐볼게요! ) Opus에 근접한 품질을 Sonnet 단가에 · Near-Opus quality at Sonnet pricing 🡒 PRO 사용자들에겐 추천, OPUS 사용자 들에겐 비추천 Fable5 구조를 넣은 Sonnet이 Opus와 블라인드 테스트에서 사실상 비겼다!! 그것도 답 1건당 비용 3분의 1로!! Sonnet + Fable 5 structure virtually tied Opus in a blind test — at 1/3 the cost per response. (bench/) 왜 Sonnet+VFF인가 비용 Sonnet은 Opus 대비 40%, Fable 대비 70% 저렴하다. 문제는 구조 없이 쓰면 그 차이가 품질 격차로 그대로 드러난다는 것이다. VFF는 그 격차를 운영 구조로 메운다. 작업 종류별 실제 절감폭(입력형 코딩 vs 출력형 글쓰기) 계산과 라우팅 기준은 COST.md 참고. 실측 결과 (2026-06-14 재검증) 원판은 Fable 5 ultracode 환경, 2026.06.11에서 생성됐고(단판이라 재현 실패), 재검증은 Opus 4.8 ultracode 멀티에이전트 하네스로 수십 개 블라인드 심판·선수 에이전트를 병렬 실행했다. 원자료까지 bench/에 공개. 원래 2026-06-11 단판 벤치("5/6승·257점")는 원자료가 안 남아 재현 불가였고, 공정 베이스라인·중립 채점표로 다시 재니 재현되지 않았다. 재현 가능한 하네스와 원자료는 bench/, 상세는 bench/RESULTS.md에 있다. 핵심 수치(중립 채점표, 독립 심판 2명 평균, 0–100): v2는 기본 진단·분량글에선 Opus와 같거나 앞서고(분량 과제는 Opus가 글자 수 초과로 감점), 깊은 추론(아키텍처 결정·복잡 성능진단)에선 Opus가 5–7점 앞선다. 압축 규칙이 품질 부채였고 그걸 들어낸 v2가 진짜 개선이

agenticaianthropicclaudeclaude-codefablefable5harnessopusprompt-engineering

Quick Facts

Stars180
Forks42
LanguagePython
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseAGPL-3.0
Quality Score45.92/100
Last Updated2026-06-14
Created2026-06-11
Platformsclaude-code, python
Est. Tokens~15k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with value-for-fable for enhanced workflows:

  • kiro-gateway — semantic(0.19)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (66%)
  • claude-ai-toolkit — semantic(0.52)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (63%)
  • claude-prompt-engineering-guide — semantic(0.27)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (60%)

value-for-fable alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a value-for-fable alternative? If you're comparing value-for-fable with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • fablize by fivetaku · ⭐ 500

    A Claude Code plugin that makes Opus behave like Fable — completion, evidence, and verification enforced as pr

  • runtm by runtm-ai · ⭐ 275

    Open-source sandboxes where coding agents build and deploy. Spin up isolated environments where Claude Code, C

  • claudepro-directory by JSONbored · ⭐ 217

    HeyClaude (formerly Claude Pro Directory) is a searchable collection of pre-built AI skills, agents, MCP serve

  • claude-code-discord by zebbern · ⭐ 202

    A Discord bot that brings Claude Code to your channels so you can chat, run shell/git, and manage branches. Ac

  • claude-skills by OneWave-AI · ⭐ 188

    172 production-ready Claude Code skills for sales, marketing, design, engineering, and AI agent architecture.

  • claude-historian-mcp by Vvkmnn · ⭐ 178

    📜 An MCP server for conversation history search and retrieval in Claude Code

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is value-for-fable?

value-for-fable is Opus에 근접한 품질을 Sonnet 단가에 — 가성비 AI 운영 모델을 직접 구축한 Claude Code 프로젝트. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 180 GitHub stars.

What programming language is value-for-fable written in?

value-for-fable is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as agentic, ai, anthropic.

How do I install or use value-for-fable?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the value-for-fable GitHub repository at github.com/itsinseong/value-for-fable. The project has 180 stars and 42 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does value-for-fable use?

value-for-fable is released under the AGPL-3.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to value-for-fable?

The top alternatives to value-for-fable on Agent Skills Hub include fablize, runtm, claudepro-directory. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools