value-for-fable: Opus에 근접한 품질을 Sonnet 단가에 — 가성비 AI 운영 모델을 직접 구축한 Claude Code 프로젝트

by itsinseong · Agent Tool · ★ 236

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

How to install value-for-fable

/plugin marketplace add https://github.com/itsinseong/value-for-fable
/plugin install value-for-fable@itsinseong

Taken from the project's README on GitHub.

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 63/100

None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.

The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.

agenticaianthropicclaudeclaude-codefablefable5harnessopusprompt-engineering

Quick Facts

Stars236
Forks47
LanguagePython
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseAGPL-3.0
Quality Score63/100
Last Updated2026-06-21
Created2026-06-11
Platformsclaude-code, python
Est. Tokens~15k

About value-for-fable

𝐕𝐚𝐥𝐮𝐞-𝐟𝐨𝐫-𝐅𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 (𝐕𝐅𝐅) 주인장 시험기간 ( 시험끝나고 더 봐볼게요! ) Opus에 근접한 품질을 Sonnet 단가에 · Near-Opus quality at Sonnet pricing 🡒 PRO 사용자들에겐 추천, OPUS 사용자 들에겐 비추천 Fable5 구조를 넣은 Sonnet이 Opus와 블라인드 테스트에서 사실상 비겼다!! 그것도 답 1건당 비용 3분의 1로!! Sonnet + Fable 5 structure virtually tied Opus in a blind test — at 1/3 the cost per response. (bench/) 왜 Sonnet+VFF인가 비용 Sonnet은 Opus 대비 40%, Fable 대비 70% 저렴하다.

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with value-for-fable for enhanced workflows:

  • kiro-gateway — semantic(0.19)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (66%)
  • claude-model-router-hook — semantic(0.28)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (64%)
  • claude-ai-toolkit — semantic(0.52)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (63%)
  • claude-prompt-engineering-guide — semantic(0.27)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (60%)

value-for-fable alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a value-for-fable alternative? If you're comparing value-for-fable with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • fablize by fivetaku · ⭐ 895

    A Claude Code plugin that makes Opus behave like Fable — completion, evidence, and verification enforced as pr

  • fable5-mode by cozytab · ⭐ 106

    Make Opus 4.8 (or any Claude model) work like Claude Fable 5 — a Claude Code skill + guard hooks (plan gate, m

  • oh-my-fable by Junhan2 · ⭐ 57

    Claude Fable 5.1 prompting guide as Claude Code skills (KO/EN/ZH). Output quality goes up on Opus 5 and Sonnet

  • phd-skills by fcakyon · ⭐ 438

    PhD Research Skills for Claude Code: paper reproduction, experiment design, paper review, result comparison an

  • claude-model-router-hook by tzachbon · ⭐ 76

    Claude Code hooks that auto-switch model tier based on task complexity

  • Hail_Hydra by AR6420 · ⭐ 50

    🐉 Hail Hydra — Multi-headed speculative execution framework for Claude Code. 10 AI agents, 3x faster, ~70% ch

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools