by itsmesherry · Agent Tool · ★ 14
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
Flagged: dynamic eval(). Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 14 |
| Forks | 3 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 73/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-13 |
| Created | 2026-03-15 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~17k |
Command-line code auditor: fast static checks, plus an optional audit where Claude investigates the code with read-only tools.
Looking for a claude-audit alternative? If you're comparing claude-audit with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace
CLI tool that generates commit messages from git changes, reviews code for quality issues, and provides debugg
AI-powered security assessment SKILLS for your codebase. Multi-language (JS, Go, Python, Rust, Java, PHP, Ruby
Automatic context preservation for Claude Code. Never lose work to compaction again. 7 hooks, 187 semantic pat
700+ AI skills for Claude and Cursor — PLG, marketing, security, DevEx, and more. One command to install.
Vendor-neutral MCP configuration manager — one CLI to add, toggle, and audit MCP servers and skills across eve
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: