by jameesy · Agent Tool · ★ 100
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 100 |
| Forks | 9 |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| Quality Score | 53/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-04-30 |
| Created | 2026-04-21 |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
Foundry A personal knowledge vault maintained by Claude. You collect sources. Claude compiles them into a wiki of concepts, connections, and open questions. Based on Andrej Karpathy's LLM wiki pattern: raw source documents go in, an LLM incrementally compiles them into concept articles with backlinks, and the wiki becomes a rich substrate for Q&A and further research.
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: