by jlin816 · Agent Tool · ★ 114
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 114 |
| Forks | 8 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| Quality Score | 61/100 |
| Last Updated | 2024-11-15 |
| Created | 2023-05-31 |
| Platforms | python |
| Est. Tokens | ~516k |
📠 The DialOp Environments Collaborative decision-oriented dialogue environments for humans and LLM agents. These environments are associated with the paper Decision-Oriented Dialogue For Human-AI Collaboration.
Looking for a dialop alternative? If you're comparing dialop with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Aser is a lightweight, self-assembling AI Agent frame.
An introduction to the world of AI Agents
A curated list of awesome resources, tools, research papers, and projects related to the concept of Large Lang
An open-source no-code tool for teams to collaborate on building, evaluating, and hosting applications leverag
Turn topics, links, and files into AI-generated research notebooks — summarize, explore, and ask anything.
A curated list of tools, papers, and datasets for applying AI to cybersecurity tasks. This list primarily focu
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: