by joabgonzalez · Codex Skill · ★ 9
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 9 |
| Forks | 0 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| Quality Score | 70/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-06-18 |
| Created | 2026-01-29 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, codex, gemini, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
Modular CLI for distributing 50+ AI agent skills across multiple coding assistants
Looking for a ai-agents-skills alternative? If you're comparing ai-agents-skills with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Cross-LLM sub-agent orchestration as an Agent Skills. Route tasks to Codex, Claude Code, Grok, GLM, Kimi, Curs
Local-first CLI for coding-agent context handoff. Transfer and resume sessions across Claude Code, Codex, Curs
Keep your skills sharp. Intelligence for agent context.
Define task-specific AI sub-agents in Markdown for any MCP-compatible tool.
CodexFlow is a unified desktop workbench for AI coding agents (Codex/Claude/Gemini/Antigravity/Grok Build) acr
Agent Dashboard: Visualization and analytics for Sessions and Quota Usage. Track, analyze, and optimize token
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: