by juliye2025 · AI Tool · ★ 1.7k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 1,705 |
| Forks | 170 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | AI Tool |
| Quality Score | 52/100 |
| Open Issues | 13 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-15 |
| Created | 2026-03-03 |
| Platforms | claude-code, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~16k |
evil-read-arxiv 邪修的论文阅读工作流 - 自动化论文搜索、推荐、分析和整理 语言 / Language 中文版 English Version 简介 这是一套兼容 Claude Code 与 OpenAI Codex 的技能（Skills）集合，用于自动化研究论文的搜索、推荐、分析和整理工作流。通过调用 arXiv 和 Semantic Scholar API，每天为你推荐高质量论文，并自动生成详细笔记和关系图谱。 更新日志 功能特点 start-my-day - 每日论文推荐 从 arXiv 搜索最近一个月的论文 从 Semantic Scholar 搜索过去一年的高热度论文 基于相关性、新近性、热门度、质量四个维度综合评分 自动生成今日概览和推荐列表 前三篇论文自动生成详细分析和提取图片 自动链接关键词到已有笔记 paper-analyze - 论文深度分析 自动识别...
Looking for a evil-read-arxiv alternative? If you're comparing evil-read-arxiv with other ai tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
This tool has been deprecated. Use Agentic Document Extraction instead.
Visual Skills Pack for Obsidian: generate Canvas, Excalidraw, and Mermaid diagrams from text with Claude Code
All powerful skills of ClaudeKit.cc!
A tool uses Windows Filtering Platform (WFP) to block Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) agents from report
A java agent to generate method mappings to use with the linux `perf` tool
Skills I use with Claude for shaping
Explore other popular ai tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: