by juyterman1000 · MCP Server · ★ 483
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
pip install entroly && entroly go
Taken from the project's README on GitHub.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 483 |
| Forks | 74 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 61/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-07 |
| Created | 2026-03-07 |
| Platforms | claude-code, codex, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~19k |
🇨🇳 中文 • 🇯🇵 日本語 • 🇰🇷 한국어 • 🇧🇷 Português • 🇪🇸 Español • 🇩🇪 Deutsch • 🇫🇷 Français • 🇷🇺 Русский • 🇮🇳 हिन्दी • 🇹🇷 Türkçe <img src="ht
These tools work well together with entroly for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a entroly alternative? If you're comparing entroly with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Reusable project context and specialist workflows for the AI tools you already use. Agents, skills, rules and
Your agent pays twice for output it has already seen. OMNI returns a handle instead: 97.2% off a file read twi
Multi-agent graph orchestration engine for autonomous software development. Independent, adversarial review wi
Spec-driven, agentic workflow framework for AI coding agents. Turn a request into a verifiable goal loop — pla
An effective and efficient coding-agent setup in under 30 seconds: best tools, unified instructions, any OS.
A collection of AI agent skills for Clawdbot, Claude Code, Codex
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: