ospec — security grade SAFE, quality 68/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 68/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by clawplays · MCP Server · ★ 485

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is ospec safe to install? View the security audit →

About ospec

OSpec.ai English | 中文 | 日本語 | <a href="docs/README.ar.md

agentic-aiagentic-codingaiai-agentsai-coding-assistantai-workflowclaude-codeclicodexcoding-agent

Quick Facts

Stars485
Forks24
LanguageJavaScript
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseMIT
Quality Score68.2297040663987/100
Last Updated2026-08-26
Created2026-03-31
Platformsclaude-code, cli, codex, gemini, mcp, node
Est. Tokens~19k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with ospec for enhanced workflows:

  • pilot-shell — semantic(0.35)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (62%)
  • FlowBoard — semantic(0.29)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (60%)
  • Frame — semantic(0.26)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (59%)
  • vibecode-pro-max-kit — semantic(0.40)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (59%)
  • get-shit-done-redux — semantic(0.26)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (59%)

ospec alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a ospec alternative? If you're comparing ospec with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • smart-ralph by tzachbon · ⭐ 544

    Spec-driven development with smart compaction. Claude Code plugin combining Ralph Wiggum loop with structured

  • SWE-AF by Agent-Field · ⭐ 1.0k

    Autonomous software engineering fleet of AI agents for production-grade PRs on AgentField: plan, code, test, a

  • agent-deck by asheshgoplani · ⭐ 935

    Terminal session manager for AI coding agents. One TUI for Claude, Gemini, OpenCode, Codex, and more.

  • agnix by agent-sh · ⭐ 422

    The missing linter and lsp for AI coding assistants. Validate CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, SKILL.md, hooks, MCP. Plug

  • agent-skills by jdrhyne · ⭐ 241

    A collection of AI agent skills for Clawdbot, Claude Code, Codex

  • quint-code by m0n0x41d · ⭐ 1.3k

    Engineering decisions engine that know when they're stale. Frame, compare, decide — with evidence decay and p

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular JavaScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is ospec?

ospec is Spec-driven, agentic workflow framework for AI coding agents. Turn a request into a verifiable goal loop — plan, act, verify — with durable specs and evidence in your repo. Works with Claude Code, Cod. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 485 GitHub stars.

What programming language is ospec written in?

ospec is primarily written in JavaScript. It covers topics such as agentic-ai, agentic-coding, ai.

How do I install or use ospec?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the ospec GitHub repository at github.com/clawplays/ospec. The project has 485 stars and 24 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does ospec use?

ospec is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to ospec?

The top alternatives to ospec on Agent Skills Hub include smart-ralph, SWE-AF, agent-deck. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools