by clawplays · MCP Server · ★ 485
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
npm install -g @clawplays/ospec-cliTaken from the project's README on GitHub.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 485 |
| Forks | 24 |
| Language | JavaScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 68/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-08-26 |
| Created | 2026-03-31 |
| Platforms | claude-code, cli, codex, gemini, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~19k |
OSpec.ai English | 中文 | 日本語 | <a href="docs/README.ar.md
These tools work well together with ospec for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a ospec alternative? If you're comparing ospec with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Spec-driven development with smart compaction. Claude Code plugin combining Ralph Wiggum loop with structured
Reusable project context and specialist workflows for the AI tools you already use. Agents, skills, rules and
Terminal session manager for AI coding agents. One TUI for Claude, Gemini, OpenCode, Codex, and more.
Autonomous software engineering fleet of AI agents for production-grade PRs on AgentField: plan, code, test, a
Cut AI context cost without trusting the compressor. Every reduction is reversible, byte-exact recoverable, an
The missing linter and lsp for AI coding assistants. Validate CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, SKILL.md, hooks, MCP. Plug
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: