Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 28 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | AI Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 63/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-18 |
| Created | 2026-09-19 |
| Platforms | cli, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~17k |
sort by meaning: order lines along a plain-English dimension, from pairwise comparisons judged by TypeSafe's Jev model
These tools work well together with jsort for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a jsort alternative? If you're comparing jsort with other ai tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Rust CLI powered by Jev from TypeSafe.ai that ranks agent skills for the next step using live session context.
A calibrated context sieve for Claude Code: every tool result is judged by a System One model before it enters
Put a live Jev (TypeSafe) meter on any video: every sentence scored, rendered as a 16:9 edit
Submit Forma <https://joinforma.com> benefit claims from the command line and Model Context Protocol (MCP) cli
Ask your house a question, get a number back. Home Assistant integration for TypeSafe Jev: typed answers as se
🔥🔥 Papers, open reproductions and independent evaluations behind System One models and Jev.
Explore other popular ai tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: