code-review-skill: what it is & alternatives

by killop · AI Tool · ★ 50

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 50/100

None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.

Quick Facts

Stars50
Forks5
LanguagePython
CategoryAI Tool
Quality Score50/100
Last Updated2026-03-25
Created2026-03-20
Platformspython
Est. Tokens~2k

About code-review-skill

Code Review Skill 自动化代码审核技能,适用于通用代码工程的定期代码质量审查。 快速开始 首次运行时,如果不存在 ,会交互式询问审核参数。后续运行自动读取配置。 工作流程 配置文件 路径: jsonc { "target": { "directories": [""], // 审核目标目录 "fileextensions": [".cs"], // 目标文件后缀 "excludedirectories": [""], // 排除目录 "excludefilepatterns": [".meta", ".Designer.cs"] // 排除文件模式 }, "git": { "since": "2026-01-17", // git log 起始日期 "branch": "" // 空 = 当前分支 }, "review": { "maxfilespermodule":...

code-review-skill alternative? Top 2 similar tools

Looking for a code-review-skill alternative? If you're comparing code-review-skill with other ai tool tools, these 2 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • claude-code-voice-skill by abracadabra50 · ⭐ 169

    Skill to talk to Claude about your projects over the phone

  • maui-skills by davidortinau · ⭐ 163

    .NET MAUI skills for GitHub Copilot and Claude Code

More AI Tool Tools

Explore other popular ai tool tools:

View all AI Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse AI Tool tools