by kimimgo · MCP Server · ★ 58
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 58 |
| Forks | 11 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | CC0-1.0 |
| Quality Score | 59/100 |
| Open Issues | 8 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-12 |
| Created | 2026-03-13 |
| Platforms | cli, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~23k |
The CAE tools an AI agent can actually call Open-source simulation, CAD & meshing tools for agentic / LLM-driven engineering — driv
These tools work well together with awesome-ai-cae for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a awesome-ai-cae alternative? If you're comparing awesome-ai-cae with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A curated, comprehensive collection of open-source AI tools, frameworks, datasets, courses, and seminal papers
MCPSDK.dev(ToolSDK.ai)'s Awesome MCP Servers and Packages Registry and Database with Structured JSON configura
Use Codex and Claude Code with COMSOL via sim-cli: .mph inspection, live Desktop sessions, bounded execution,
🌍 The open-source Wikipedia of AI — 2M+ apps, agents, LLMs & datasets. Updated daily with tools, tutorials &
✨✨Latest Advances on Neuro-Symbolic Learning in the era of Large Language Models
Turn any CAE files into structured text an agent can use
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: