by knowledgestack · MCP Server · ★ 64
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 64 |
| Forks | 9 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 58/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-02 |
| Created | 2026-03-02 |
| Platforms | claude-code, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~21k |
📊 Make XLSX LLM Ready 🤖 ks-xlsx-parser — the open-source Python library that parses Excel (.xlsx) files into citation-ready JSON for LLMs, RAG pipelines, and AI agents (LangChain
These tools work well together with excel-parser for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a excel-parser alternative? If you're comparing excel-parser with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
An introduction to the world of AI Agents
Explore the must-have external ready-made toolkits to integrate with your AI agents built with Python and Type
Structured Data Extractor for AI Agents. Search your documents or the web for specific data and get it back in
BrandDocs is a set of agent skills that learn your existing Word, PowerPoint and Excel templates and generate
Web app for teams of 20+ members. In-built connections to major LLMs via API. Share chats, prompts, and agents
c4 GenAI Suite
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: