kube-agentic-networking — security grade SAFE, quality 60/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 60/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by kubernetes-sigs · Agent Tool · ★ 120

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is kube-agentic-networking safe to install? View the security audit →

About kube-agentic-networking

kube-agentic-networking This subproject aims to deliver the following: Core Capabilities Provide standardized APIs for secure, governed communication between agents, tools, and potentially LLMs across Kubernetes cluster boundaries (ingress, egress, and east-west traffic) Attempt to design APIs around user-facing goals (e.g., "Agent A can communicate with Tool B") rather than protocol-specific constructs, ensuring adaptability as new AI-first protocols emerge alongside MCP and A2A Enable protocol-aware networking capabilities where necessary (e.g., MCP tool-level authorization) while keeping core APIs protocol-agnostic and future-proof Establish agent identity and authentication mechanisms that allow agents to be uniquely identified and verified across network boundaries Security & Governance Define authorization policies that control which agents can communicate with other agents, tools, and LLMs at a granular level (e.g., specific MCP tool functions) Integrate AI safety and security extension points to support external authentication, authorization, and policy enforcement decisions Provide auditable traffic management capabilities (rate limiting, access controls) suitable for...

Quick Facts

Stars120
Forks42
LanguageGo
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseApache-2.0
Quality Score59.8256274636854/100
Open Issues40
Last Updated2026-09-01
Created2025-10-24
Platformsgo, k8s
Est. Tokens~16k

kube-agentic-networking alternative? Top 3 similar tools

Looking for a kube-agentic-networking alternative? If you're comparing kube-agentic-networking with other agent tool tools, these 3 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • claude-plugins by Kamalnrf · ⭐ 537

    Lightweight registry to discover, install, and manage all public Claude plugins and agent skills for your favo

  • tutor-skills by RoundTable02 · ⭐ 400

    A Claude Code skill that turns PDFs, docs, and codebases into Obsidian study vaults

  • repren by jlevy · ⭐ 374

    Power rename/refactor tool for CLI and agent use

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular Go Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is kube-agentic-networking?

kube-agentic-networking is Agentic networking policies and governance for agents and tools in Kubernetes. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 120 GitHub stars.

What programming language is kube-agentic-networking written in?

kube-agentic-networking is primarily written in Go.

How do I install or use kube-agentic-networking?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the kube-agentic-networking GitHub repository at github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kube-agentic-networking. The project has 120 stars and 42 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does kube-agentic-networking use?

kube-agentic-networking is released under the Apache-2.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to kube-agentic-networking?

The top alternatives to kube-agentic-networking on Agent Skills Hub include claude-plugins, tutor-skills, repren. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools