openclaw-lark — security grade SAFE, quality 64/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 64/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by larksuite · Codex Skill · ★ 2.4k

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is openclaw-lark safe to install? View the security audit →

About openclaw-lark

OpenClaw Lark/Feishu Plugin 中文版 | English This is the official Lark/Feishu plugin for OpenClaw, developed and maintained by the Lark/Feishu Open Platform team. It seamlessly connects your OpenClaw Agent to your Lark/Feishu workspace, enabling it to directly read from and write to messages, docs, bases, calendars, tasks, and more. Features This plugin provides comprehensive Lark/Feishu integration for OpenClaw, including: Additionally, the plugin supports: 📱 Interactive Cards: Real-time status updates

Quick Facts

Stars2,382
Forks312
LanguageTypeScript
CategoryCodex Skill
LicenseMIT
Quality Score63.6285738372674/100
Open Issues313
Last Updated2026-07-22
Created2026-03-09
Platformsnode
Est. Tokens~15k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with openclaw-lark for enhanced workflows:

  • openclaw-feishu — semantic(0.45)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (66%)
  • Feishu-MCP — semantic(0.25)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (59%)
  • feishu-claude-code-bridge — semantic(0.17)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (56%)

openclaw-lark alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a openclaw-lark alternative? If you're comparing openclaw-lark with other codex skill tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • refly by refly-ai · ⭐ 7.5k

    The first open-source agent skills builder. Define skills by vibe workflow, run on Claude Code, Cursor, Codex

  • Claude-to-IM-skill by op7418 · ⭐ 2.9k

    Bridge Claude Code / Codex to IM platforms — chat with AI coding agents from Telegram, Discord, or Feishu/Lark

  • pi-skills by badlogic · ⭐ 2.5k

    Skills for pi coding agent (compatible with Claude Code and Codex CLI)

  • agent-skill-creator by FrancyJGLisboa · ⭐ 2.4k

    Build tested agent skills and govern their lifecycle through a user-defined marketplace: evidence, discovery,

  • learning-opportunities by DrCatHicks · ⭐ 2.4k

    A Claude or Codex skill for deliberate skill development during AI-assisted coding

  • nano-banana-pro-prompts-recommend-skill by YouMind-OpenLab · ⭐ 1.9k

    AI skill for OpenClaw & Claude Code — recommend from 10000+ Nano Banana Pro (Gemini) image prompts. Smart sear

More Codex Skill Tools

Explore other popular codex skill tools:

View all Codex Skill tools →

Popular TypeScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is openclaw-lark?

openclaw-lark is 飞书官方出品的 OpenClaw 飞书/Lark Channel 插件. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 2.4k GitHub stars.

What programming language is openclaw-lark written in?

openclaw-lark is primarily written in TypeScript.

How do I install or use openclaw-lark?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the openclaw-lark GitHub repository at github.com/larksuite/openclaw-lark. The project has 2.4k stars and 312 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does openclaw-lark use?

openclaw-lark is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to openclaw-lark?

The top alternatives to openclaw-lark on Agent Skills Hub include refly, Claude-to-IM-skill, pi-skills. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Codex Skill tools