deep-learning-birthday — security grade SAFE, quality 51/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 51/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by latent-variable · Agent Tool · ★ 9

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is deep-learning-birthday safe to install? View the security audit →

About deep-learning-birthday

Happy Birthday to Me (Self-Supervised): a riso-print music video for AlexNet's 14th birthday, made with local open models and Claude

Quick Facts

Stars9
Forks2
LanguageJavaScript
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseMIT
Quality Score51.4601603050071/100
Last Updated2026-10-02
Created2026-09-28
Platformsclaude-code, node
Est. Tokens~14k

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular JavaScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is deep-learning-birthday?

deep-learning-birthday is Happy Birthday to Me (Self-Supervised): a riso-print music video for AlexNet's 14th birthday, made with local open models and Claude. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 9 GitHub stars.

What programming language is deep-learning-birthday written in?

deep-learning-birthday is primarily written in JavaScript.

How do I install or use deep-learning-birthday?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the deep-learning-birthday GitHub repository at github.com/latent-variable/deep-learning-birthday. The project has 9 stars and 2 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does deep-learning-birthday use?

deep-learning-birthday is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools