by latestaiagents · Agent Tool · ★ 5
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 5 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 72/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-04-15 |
| Created | 2026-02-04 |
| Est. Tokens | ~21k |
Marketplace for AI agent skills and plugins - development, productivity, operations, marketing and beyond
Looking for a agent-skills alternative? If you're comparing agent-skills with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Awesome Agentic AI Learning Resource by DevKay is a curated roadmap for mastering Agentic AI—from ML foundatio
Vinagent is a comprehensive Agentic AI library that helps integrate tools, memory, workflows, and observabilit
Automated loop driver, slash commands, council automation, MCP browser bridge, and portfolio governance for Cl
Gasoline Agentic Browser MCP — Browser observability for AI coding assistants. Streams console logs, network e
✈️🌍 Production-Ready TripPlanner Multi-AI Agent Project: Transform your travel planning with AI-driven assist
CLI-first MCP server for composer-based Kirby CMS projects — inspect blueprints/templates/plugins, interact wi
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: