deepseek-v4-flash-vision-rag — security grade SAFE, quality 59/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 59/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by liangdabiao · Agent Tool · ★ 67

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is deepseek-v4-flash-vision-rag safe to install? View the security audit →

About deepseek-v4-flash-vision-rag

DeepSeek V4-Flash Vision RAG 让 AI 真正"看懂" 一份 PDF,然后你对它提问:它告诉你答案、答案在第几页, 并把那一页的原图展示出来给你核对。 基于 DeepSeek 视觉大模型 的 PDF 深度问答与检索 (vision RAG)agent skill。支持文字版 PDF,也支持扫描版;能看懂 图表、表格、代码块、公式,而不只是认字。 一、它能做什么 每次回答都会生成一个自包含 HTML 预览页(答案 + 全部引用页原图内嵌其中), 双击浏览器打开即可查看,无需联网。 二、实测效果(120 页中文书,test.pdf) 三、工作原理(通俗版) 整个系统就做两件事,像人读一本书: 第一阶段:读一遍书,做笔记(ingest,一次性) 模型每读一页,就写一张卡片——这就是 。第 22 页的真实卡片长这样: json {"page": 22, "type": "正文", "headings": [{"level": 1, "text": "§03 四种模式,人话版"}], "summary": "介绍四种模式:标准、PTC、极简、创造,并指出它们不在同一维度上,标准模式是默

skills

Quick Facts

Stars67
Forks12
LanguagePython
CategoryAgent Tool
Quality Score59.1826241571748/100
Last Updated2026-08-31
Created2026-08-24
Platformspython
Est. Tokens~7k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with deepseek-v4-flash-vision-rag for enhanced workflows:

  • codex-deepseek-subagent — semantic(0.39)+complementary+shared_fw(openai)+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (71%)
  • pdfmux — semantic(0.29)+complementary+shared_fw(openai)+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (68%)
  • claude-code-vision-skill — semantic(0.22)+complementary+shared_fw(openai)+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (66%)

deepseek-v4-flash-vision-rag alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a deepseek-v4-flash-vision-rag alternative? If you're comparing deepseek-v4-flash-vision-rag with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • ATaC by ATaC-team · ⭐ 310

    Record and Replay AI Agent Trajectories.

  • JoySafeter by jd-opensource · ⭐ 300

    🚀 JoySafeter: An enterprise AI Agent Platform—Not just chatting. building、running、testing, and tracing autono

  • human-mcp by mrgoonie · ⭐ 293

    Bringing Human Capabilities to AI Agents

  • gram by speakeasy-api · ⭐ 271

    Securely scale AI usage across your organization. A single stack to Connect, Secure, Observe and Distribute ag

  • skyll by assafelovic · ⭐ 247

    A tool for autonomous agents like OpenClaw to discover and learn skills autonomously

  • PolyMCP by poly-mcp · ⭐ 170

    Polymcp provides a simple and efficient way to interact with MCP servers using custom agents

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular Python Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is deepseek-v4-flash-vision-rag?

deepseek-v4-flash-vision-rag is DeepSeek V4-Flash Vision RAG 让 AI 真正"看懂" 一份 PDF,然后你对它提问:它告诉你答案、答案在第几页, 并把那一页的原图展示出来给你核对。 基于 DeepSeek 视觉大模型 deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp 的 PDF 深度问答与检索 (vision RAG)agent skill。支持文字版 PDF,也支持扫描版;能看懂 图表、表. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 67 GitHub stars.

What programming language is deepseek-v4-flash-vision-rag written in?

deepseek-v4-flash-vision-rag is primarily written in Python. It covers topics such as skills.

How do I install or use deepseek-v4-flash-vision-rag?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the deepseek-v4-flash-vision-rag GitHub repository at github.com/liangdabiao/deepseek-v4-flash-vision-rag. The project has 67 stars and 12 forks, indicating an active community.

What are the best alternatives to deepseek-v4-flash-vision-rag?

The top alternatives to deepseek-v4-flash-vision-rag on Agent Skills Hub include ATaC, JoySafeter, human-mcp. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools