No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
by liangdabiao · Codex Skill · ★ 71
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
🔒 Is weekend-city-trip safe to install? View the security audit →
Weekend City Trip · 周末城市旅游攻略调研 Skill 一个让 AI 帮你 5 分钟深度调研任意中国城市周末玩法的 Claude Code/Codex Skill。 基于博查 WebSearch API(博查 API),输出图文并茂、可执行的 Markdown / HTML 攻略。 目录 这是什么 解决什么问题 能调研哪些内容(11 个方向) 使用示例 生成报告长什么样 前置准备 安装 工作流程(9 步法) 项目结构 关键能力 常见问题 限制与边界 成本估算 贡献 许可 这是什么 weekend-city-trip 是一个 [Claude Code/Codex Skill],专门用来做中国城市的周末 / 短期(1 个月内)旅游深度调研。 你只需要对 Claude Code/Codex 说一句话,比如: "调研下周末广州有什么好玩的" 这个 skill 就会自动: 算清楚"下周末"是哪两天 用博查 API 并行发起 10+ 次中文网页搜索 把搜索结果按 10 节标准结构整合成一份图文并茂的 Markdown 报告 自动质量检查 — 不达标会触发补查询重写(最多 2 轮迭代) (可选)把 Markdown 转成漂亮的 HTML 单文件方便分享 最终交付物是一份 20-30 KB 的城市周末行动方案,覆盖吃、喝、玩、乐、行、住各个维度。 解决什么问题 自己做一份"周末去 XX 城市"的攻略,手动查资料痛点很明显: 能调研哪些内容(11 个方向) 哪里有创意市集、古着市
| Stars | 71 |
| Forks | 9 |
| Language | HTML |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| Quality Score | 62.6494135492042/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-07-13 |
| Created | 2026-06-29 |
| Platforms | claude-code, codex |
| Est. Tokens | ~18k |
These tools work well together with weekend-city-trip for enhanced workflows:
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
weekend-city-trip is claude code / codex skill , 一个让 AI 帮你 5 分钟深度调研任意中国城市周末玩法的agent skill, 寻找精神旷野：户外消费告别长途远行、装备内卷，转向日常低成本微沉浸；菜市场、城市老街成为年轻人精神微旅行目的地，CityWalk 演化成主题探索路线，日常场景即可实现情绪解压。. It is categorized as a Codex Skill with 71 GitHub stars.
weekend-city-trip is primarily written in HTML.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the weekend-city-trip GitHub repository at github.com/liangdabiao/weekend-city-trip. The project has 71 stars and 9 forks, indicating an active community.
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: