No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
by BENZEMA216 · Claude Skill · ★ 59
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
🔒 Is rent-ops safe to install? View the security audit →
rent-ops AI 租房助手 — Agent Skill 自动爬取各平台房源 · 高德地图可视化 · 八维度智能评分 · 风险预警 功能 安装 全局安装（推荐） 在任意目录下都能使用 ： 项目级安装 仅在当前项目中使用： 检查安装状态 兼容性 本 skill 遵循 Agent Skills 开放标准，兼容所有支持该标准的 AI 工具（Claude Code、Cursor、Gemini CLI、VS Code Copilot 等）。 快速开始 首次运行会引导你配置城市、预算、户型等租房需求。 多城市支持 所有平台 URL、豆瓣小组 ID、行政区和坐标全部通过 驱动。切换城市只改 的 字段即可。 内置城市 ⚠️ 豆瓣 gr
| Stars | 59 |
| Forks | 10 |
| Language | HTML |
| Category | Claude Skill |
| Quality Score | 58.8406841753143/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-04-23 |
| Created | 2026-04-10 |
| Platforms | claude-code |
| Est. Tokens | ~97k |
Looking for a rent-ops alternative? If you're comparing rent-ops with other claude skill tools, these 1 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A tool for autonomous agents like OpenClaw to discover and learn skills autonomously
Explore other popular claude skill tools:
rent-ops is AI 租房助手 — Claude Code Skill，主动扫描各平台房源、智能评估打分、高德地图可视化. It is categorized as a Claude Skill with 59 GitHub stars.
rent-ops is primarily written in HTML.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the rent-ops GitHub repository at github.com/BENZEMA216/rent-ops. The project has 59 stars and 10 forks, indicating an active community.
The top alternatives to rent-ops on Agent Skills Hub include skyll. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: