by lidge-jun · MCP Server · ★ 231
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
npm install -g agbrowse
npm install -g agbrowse@latestTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 231 |
| Forks | 31 |
| Language | JavaScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 65/100 |
| Open Issues | 2 |
| Last Updated | 2026-08-22 |
| Created | 2026-03-07 |
| Platforms | browser, cli, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~25k |
agbrowse Standalone Chrome/CDP browser automation and web-ai CLI for AI agents. It turns browser work into small, inspectable terminal commands: observe the page, act by stable references, collect screenshots/console/network evidence, and run ChatGPT, Gemini, or Grok web UI sessions without paying an MCP token tax. is a serverless extraction of the cli-jaw / 30browser browser workflow.
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: