by lightpanda-io · Codex Skill · ★ 115
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
Featured in: browser-use, Playwright MCP & AI Browser Agents
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 115 |
| Forks | 13 |
| Language | Shell |
| Category | Codex Skill |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 65/100 |
| Open Issues | 2 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-05 |
| Created | 2026-02-05 |
| Platforms | browser, cli |
| Est. Tokens | ~10k |
Lightpanda Skill for LLM Agents A skill that provides integration with Lightpanda, a fast headless browser optimized for data extraction and web automation. What is this? This is a generalist skill for LLM agents (Claude Code, Openclaw, and others) that teaches agents how to use Lightpanda as a drop-in replacement for Chrome/Chromium when performing web scraping and automation tasks.
These tools work well together with agent-skill for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a agent-skill alternative? If you're comparing agent-skill with other codex skill tools, these 3 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
🚀 170+ pre-built skills for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex & 14+ AI tools. Stop re-teaching your AI the same thin
Claude Code / Codex skill: reverse engineer a product & technical spec from a git branch
A Codex/Claude skill that maintains per-repo operating theory documents.
Explore other popular codex skill tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: