livecontext-ce — security grade SAFE, quality 67/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 67/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by livecontext-ai · MCP Server · ★ 658

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is livecontext-ce safe to install? View the security audit →

About livecontext-ce

LiveContext The AI automation platform. One message in, a working automation out. Describe the job in chat and LiveContext builds it in front of you: a workflow you can read, AI agents with scoped access and budgets you control, and a small app your team actually uses. Chat, Workflow, Agent and App in one self-hosted platform. No code to write, nothing to stitch together. An open-source, self-hosted alternative to n8n, Zapier and Make, with AI agents built in. <source media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" srcset="frontend/public/landing/read

agent-frameworkagentsaiai-agentsai-automationautomationdockerfair-codellmllm-agents

Quick Facts

Stars658
Forks65
LanguageJava
CategoryMCP Server
Quality Score66.6110097143348/100
Last Updated2026-10-03
Created2026-06-16
Platformsdocker, java, mcp
Est. Tokens~18k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with livecontext-ce for enhanced workflows:

  • ai-git-bot — semantic(0.31)+complementary+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (65%)
  • test-automation-skills-agents — semantic(0.17)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (56%)

livecontext-ce alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a livecontext-ce alternative? If you're comparing livecontext-ce with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • flow-like by TM9657 · ⭐ 865

    Flow-Like: Strongly Typed Enterprise Scale Workflows. Built for scalability, speed, seamless AI integration an

  • agents by inkeep · ⭐ 1.4k

    Create AI Agents in a No-Code Visual Builder or TypeScript SDK with full 2-way sync. For shipping AI assistant

  • selfhost-ai by kossakovsky · ⭐ 938

    One-command installer for a self-hosted AI stack on your own server: n8n, Ollama, Open WebUI, OpenClaw, Dify,

  • concierge by concierge-hq · ⭐ 531

    🚀 Universal SDK for building next-gen MCP servers

  • ai-agent-automation by vmDeshpande · ⭐ 178

    Modular AI agent workflow automation platform with schedulers, tools, and observability. https://vmdeshpande.g

  • harbor by av · ⭐ 3.2k

    Stop configuring your AI stack. Start using it. One command brings a complete pre-wired LLM stack with hundred

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Java Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is livecontext-ce?

livecontext-ce is The AI automation platform, self-hosted. Describe the job in chat and LiveContext builds it: readable workflows, scoped AI agents, and small apps your team uses. Chat, Workflow, Agent and App on one c. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 658 GitHub stars.

What programming language is livecontext-ce written in?

livecontext-ce is primarily written in Java. It covers topics such as agent-framework, agents, ai.

How do I install or use livecontext-ce?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the livecontext-ce GitHub repository at github.com/livecontext-ai/livecontext-ce. The project has 658 stars and 65 forks, indicating an active community.

What are the best alternatives to livecontext-ce?

The top alternatives to livecontext-ce on Agent Skills Hub include flow-like, agents, selfhost-ai. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools