mateclaw — security grade SAFE, quality 61/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 61/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by mateaix · MCP Server · ★ 1.1k

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is mateclaw safe to install? View the security audit →

About mateclaw

MateClaw Your second brain Agent Harness · Spring Boot inside · One JAR to ship [Website] [Live Demo] [Documentation] [中文]

agentagent-harnessai-agentdingtalk-robotfeishu-botllm-wikiloop-engineeringmcp-protocolmulti-agentmultiagent

Quick Facts

Stars1,127
Forks335
LanguageJava
CategoryMCP Server
LicenseApache-2.0
Quality Score61.1921037054202/100
Open Issues178
Last Updated2026-09-23
Created2026-04-04
Platformsjava, mcp
Est. Tokens~20k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with mateclaw for enhanced workflows:

  • mateclaw — semantic(1.00)+shared_fw(spring)+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (78%)
  • spring-ai-agent-utils — semantic(0.36)+complementary+shared_fw(spring)+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (75%)
  • spring-ai-tool-search-tool — semantic(0.33)+complementary+shared_fw(spring)+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (74%)
  • JavaClaw — semantic(0.42)+complementary+shared_fw(spring)+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (73%)
  • spring-ai — semantic(0.51)+shared_fw(spring)+rare_topics+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (65%)

mateclaw alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a mateclaw alternative? If you're comparing mateclaw with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • mateclaw by matevip · ⭐ 624

    🤖 MateClaw — Your second brain with Multi-Agent Orchestration, MCP Protocol, Skills & Memory, Dream, and Mult

  • ComfyUI-OpenClaw by rookiestar28 · ⭐ 558

    Your own personal AIGC Factory. Any picture. Any reel. The Comfy way. ©️

  • n8n-claw by freddy-schuetz · ⭐ 550

    OpenClaw-inspired autonomous AI agent built entirely in n8n. Adaptive RAG-powered memory, Skills via MCP templ

  • JoySafeter by jd-opensource · ⭐ 300

    🚀 JoySafeter: An enterprise AI Agent Platform—Not just chatting. building、running、testing, and tracing autono

  • cc-harness-skills by LearnPrompt · ⭐ 233

    Portable CC-inspired skills for memory, verification, multi-agent coordination, context compression, and proac

  • bitrouter by bitrouter · ⭐ 230

    The minimal interpretable model router that learns & adapts to your agent workflows

More MCP Server Tools

Explore other popular mcp server tools:

View all MCP Server tools →

Popular Java Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is mateclaw?

mateclaw is 🤖 MateClaw — Your second brain with Multi-Agent Orchestration, MCP Protocol, Skills & Memory, Dream, and Multi-Channel Support. Built on Spring AI Alibaba.. It is categorized as a MCP Server with 1.1k GitHub stars.

What programming language is mateclaw written in?

mateclaw is primarily written in Java. It covers topics such as agent, agent-harness, ai-agent.

How do I install or use mateclaw?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the mateclaw GitHub repository at github.com/mateaix/mateclaw. The project has 1.1k stars and 335 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does mateclaw use?

mateclaw is released under the Apache-2.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to mateclaw?

The top alternatives to mateclaw on Agent Skills Hub include mateclaw, ComfyUI-OpenClaw, n8n-claw. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse MCP Server tools