by mattn · LLM Plugin · ★ 46
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 46 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Language | Go |
| Category | LLM Plugin |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 75/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-23 |
| Created | 2026-09-23 |
| Platforms | cli, go |
| Est. Tokens | ~5k |
Go SDK and CLI for TypeSafe Jev: typed decisions (yes/no, choice, score) from a model
Looking for a go-jev alternative? If you're comparing go-jev with other llm plugin tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
A curated list of Jev use cases, projects, SDKs, and resources. Jev is TypeSafe AI's System One model for fast
✋ Interactive CLI tool for selecting and bundling code into a single, LLM-ready output file
AI-powered JSON translation tool with agentic reflection using OpenAI, Anthropic, and Gemini APIs
Ask your house a question, get a number back. Home Assistant integration for TypeSafe Jev: typed answers as se
Open-source alternative to TypeSafe's Jev: a System One style model layer that gives typed, calibrated decisio
Authentication, analytics, and prompt visibility for MCP servers with zero code changes. Supports OAuth2.1, DC
Explore other popular llm plugin tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: