aigc-weekly — security grade SAFE, quality 66/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 66/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by miantiao-me · Agent Tool · ★ 563

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is aigc-weekly safe to install? View the security audit →

About aigc-weekly

Agili 的 AIGC 周刊 一个由 Agentic AI Agent 驱动的 AIGC(人工智能生成内容)精选周刊。本项目利用最新的 AI 和 Serverless 技术,为您提供最新的资讯、工具和资源。 在线阅读: RSS订阅: 🚀 特性 AI 智能策展:利用 Agentic AI Agent 自动发现和筛选内容。 现代技术栈:基于 Next.js 15、Payload CMS 3.0 和 Cloudflare 边缘基础设施构建。 Serverless 架构:完全部署在 Cloudflare (Workers, D1, R2, Containers) 上,实现高性能和低延迟。 Agent MCP 集成:使用模型上下文协议 (MCP) 允许 AI Agent 直接与 CMS 交互。 🛠 技术栈 框架:Next.js (App Router) & OpenNext CMS:Payload CMS (Headless) 数据库:Cloudflare D1 (SQLite) 存储:Cloudflare R2 (对象存储) Agent 框架:OpenCode Agent 运行时:Cloudflare Containers (需要付费套餐,或者在本地运行) 边缘运行时:Cloudflare Workers 🏗 架构 本项目包含三个主要组件: Next.js 应用 ():负责面向读者的前端页面以及 Payload CMS 管理界面。 OpenCode Agent ():一个独立的 Agent 服务,运行在 Cloudflare Containers 上,负责收集信息并通过 MCP 更新 CMS。 Cloudflare Worker ():转发请求到 Container 并控制其生命周期。 🏁 快速开始 前置要求 Node.js:v22 或更高版本 pnpm:v10 或更高版本 Cloudflare 账号:用于 D1、R2 和 Workers

agentaiclaude-agentclaude-codecloudflare-containerspayloadcms

Quick Facts

Stars563
Forks65
LanguageTypeScript
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseAGPL-3.0
Quality Score66.1798910234957/100
Open Issues8
Last Updated2026-09-21
Created2025-11-29
Platformsclaude-code, node
Est. Tokens~14k

aigc-weekly alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a aigc-weekly alternative? If you're comparing aigc-weekly with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • mcp-shrimp-task-manager by cjo4m06 · ⭐ 2.2k

    Shrimp Task Manager is a task tool built for AI Agents, emphasizing chain-of-thought, reflection, and style co

  • agents by inkeep · ⭐ 1.4k

    Create AI Agents in a No-Code Visual Builder or TypeScript SDK with full 2-way sync. For shipping AI assistant

  • chunkhound by chunkhound · ⭐ 1.4k

    Your entire engineering context, deeply understood

  • mysql_mcp_server by designcomputer · ⭐ 1.4k

    A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables secure interaction with MySQL databases

  • tuui by AI-QL · ⭐ 1.2k

    A desktop MCP client designed as a tool unitary utility integration, accelerating AI adoption through the Mode

  • better-chatbot by cgoinglove · ⭐ 1.1k

    Just a Better Chatbot. Powered by Agent & MCP & Workflows.

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular TypeScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is aigc-weekly?

aigc-weekly is Agili 的 AIGC 周刊 - 一个由 Agentic AI Agent 驱动的 AIGC(人工智能生成内容)精选周刊。. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 563 GitHub stars.

What programming language is aigc-weekly written in?

aigc-weekly is primarily written in TypeScript. It covers topics such as agent, ai, claude-agent.

How do I install or use aigc-weekly?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the aigc-weekly GitHub repository at github.com/miantiao-me/aigc-weekly. The project has 563 stars and 65 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does aigc-weekly use?

aigc-weekly is released under the AGPL-3.0 license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to aigc-weekly?

The top alternatives to aigc-weekly on Agent Skills Hub include mcp-shrimp-task-manager, agents, chunkhound. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools