jevry — security grade SAFE, quality 65/100

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 65/100

No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

by michaelswissa · Agent Tool · ★ 121

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

🔒 Is jevry safe to install? View the security audit →

About jevry

A browser built around Jev. Language models plan. Jev decides. Chromium acts.An open-source desktop browser that turns natural-language tasks intostructured decisions, guarded actions, and observable results. Install · Demo · Why Jev? · Architecture · Benchmarks · Contribute Jevry explores a practical question: what happens when a browser's next action is a typed model decision? The browser observes its current state, offers the actions it can actually execute, and asks TypeSafe's Jev to

ai-agentsbrowser-automationdesktop-appelectronresearchtypescript

Quick Facts

Stars121
Forks3
LanguageTypeScript
CategoryAgent Tool
LicenseMIT
Quality Score65.0986853182318/100
Last Updated2026-10-01
Created2026-09-24
Platformsbrowser, node
Est. Tokens~19k

Compatible Skills

These tools work well together with jevry for enhanced workflows:

  • oya-browser — semantic(0.30)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (60%)
  • sweet-cookie — semantic(0.29)+complementary+same_lang+similar_pop+shared_platform (60%)

jevry alternative? Top 6 similar tools

Looking for a jevry alternative? If you're comparing jevry with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • mcp-gearbox by rohitsoni007 · ⭐ 62

    A modern desktop application for managing Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers across multiple AI agents

  • palot by ItsWendell · ⭐ 190

    Just another desktop client for OpenCode 2. Manage projects, sessions, parallel agents, requests, and changes

  • Claude-Agent-Team-Manager by DatafyingTech · ⭐ 140

    Visual org-chart desktop app for managing Claude Code agent teams, skills, and configurations

  • openclaw-desktop by rshodoskar-star · ⭐ 119

    🖥️ A native desktop client for OpenClaw premium UI experience without the browser. Built with Electron + Rea

  • web-agent-protocol by OTA-Tech-AI · ⭐ 509

    🌐Web Agent Protocol (WAP) - Record and replay user interactions in the browser with MCP support

  • flyto-core by flytohub · ⭐ 483

    AI said it finished. Flyto2 shows the proof.

More Agent Tool Tools

Explore other popular agent tool tools:

View all Agent Tool tools →

Popular TypeScript Agent Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What is jevry?

jevry is Your browser. Ready to act. An MIT-licensed desktop browser agent for website tasks, cited research, and supported games.. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 121 GitHub stars.

What programming language is jevry written in?

jevry is primarily written in TypeScript. It covers topics such as ai-agents, browser-automation, desktop-app.

How do I install or use jevry?

You can find installation instructions and usage details in the jevry GitHub repository at github.com/michaelswissa/jevry. The project has 121 stars and 3 forks, indicating an active community.

What license does jevry use?

jevry is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.

What are the best alternatives to jevry?

The top alternatives to jevry on Agent Skills Hub include mcp-gearbox, palot, Claude-Agent-Team-Manager. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse Agent Tool tools