by mikeadolan · MCP Server · ★ 19
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 19 |
| Forks | 1 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 68/100 |
| Open Issues | 1 |
| Last Updated | 2026-05-27 |
| Created | 2026-04-01 |
| Platforms | claude-code, mcp, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~223k |
Persistent memory for Claude Code. Local SQLite + MCP + hooks.
Looking for a claude-brain alternative? If you're comparing claude-brain with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Local-first AI knowledge layer. Extract architecture, query from any AI tool via MCP. Private by architecture.
🏛 [UNDER CONSTRUCTION] A (roman) claude plugin marketplace
Local-first AI memory archive. Import ChatGPT, Claude, and Grok exports, generate semantic embeddings, and sea
Automated loop driver, slash commands, council automation, MCP browser bridge, and portfolio governance for Cl
Outcome-based persistent memory MCP server for Claude Code and OpenCode. Good advice promoted, bad advice demo
A verification-first engineering toolkit for Claude Code. Built for senior ICs and tech leads who already know
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: