by mikker · Agent Tool · ★ 80
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
npx skills add mikker/semantic-review
npx semantic-reviewTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 80 |
| Forks | 3 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 60/100 |
| Open Issues | 2 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-07 |
| Created | 2026-07-27 |
| Platforms | node |
| Est. Tokens | ~14k |
semantic-review Tell me that again but slowly... Semantic diff review for coding agents. Install the bundled agent skill: An LLM reads a git diff and reorganizes it into a narrative HTML report — grouped by concern, not alphabetically, with the interesting excerpts inline, highlighted and commentable.
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: