by mpuig · Agent Tool · ★ 15
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 15 |
| Forks | 2 |
| Language | Python |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 74/100 |
| Last Updated | 2026-03-15 |
| Created | 2026-03-08 |
| Platforms | cli, python |
| Est. Tokens | ~14k |
Agent skill for generating professional PowerPoint decks. 7 composable skills and a purpose-built CLI.
Looking for a agent-slides alternative? If you're comparing agent-slides with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Vendor-neutral MCP configuration manager — one CLI to add, toggle, and audit MCP servers and skills across eve
A toolkit that makes Claude Code better at engineering — session memory, dependency analysis, large file navig
Turn feature specs into merged PRs with a self-supervising swarm of coding agents — parallel execution, isolat
BizDevOps rhythm manager for Claude Code — trace business goals to code changes with 18 skills
Context engineering for coding agents - CLAUDE.md templates, mechanical enforcement, and a field guide to 20+
[ICML 2026] JustAsk: Curious Code Agents Reveal System Prompts in Frontier LLMs | Verified on Claude Code | Au
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: