by nano-muse · MCP Server · ★ 2.3k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
uv tool install nanomuseTaken from the project's README on GitHub. Check the security audit before running it.
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 2,338 |
| Forks | 273 |
| Language | Swift |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | GPL-3.0 |
| Quality Score | 60/100 |
| Open Issues | 80 |
| Last Updated | 2026-10-23 |
| Created | 2026-09-23 |
| Platforms | browser, mcp |
| Est. Tokens | ~22k |
nanoMuse English | 简体中文 | Website 🐾 nanoMuse is an open-source personal AI agent inspired by Meta's [Muse](h
These tools work well together with nanoMuse for enhanced workflows:
Looking for a nanoMuse alternative? If you're comparing nanoMuse with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
OpenGUI is an Android GUI agent framework for phone-use AI that can see, plan, and operate real mobile apps th
Open-source AI agent desktop app for Windows & macOS. One-click install Claude Code, MCP tools, and Skills — w
The agent that remembers and learns.
🦭 A cross-device desktop AI agent with memory, autonomous goals, dynamic workflows, and headless deployment |
The agent that remembers and learns.
The agent that remembers and learns.
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: