by nicknisi · Agent Tool · ★ 51
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours.
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 51 |
| Forks | 10 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | Agent Tool |
| License | MIT |
| Quality Score | 65/100 |
| Open Issues | 4 |
| Last Updated | 2026-11-02 |
| Created | 2026-08-06 |
| Platforms | claude-code, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~17k |
pi-extensions Nick Nisi's pi extensions — a pnpm monorepo of independently installable pi packages. Each package under is a self-contained pi extension (or shared library) with its own manifest; install only the ones you want. Install Packages are private (not on npm).
Looking for a pi-extensions alternative? If you're comparing pi-extensions with other agent tool tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
Some tools help. Some tools assist. Villani Code intervenes.
pi extension that exposes agent-browser as a native tool for browser automation
elastic inference for your agentic workloads, on your terms
Codex-style goal tracking and continuation for pi.
My Pi coding agent setup: secret redaction, LSP, searchable context, recall, telemetry, observability, and tea
AI Coding Agent Multiplexer
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: