open-jev: Browser-focused TypeScript library for typed decisions: one piece of text plus any number of typed questions

by nico-martin · AI Tool · ★ 44

Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h

Security audit verdict: SAFE · quality 69/100

None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →

The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.

Quick Facts

Stars44
Forks8
LanguageTypeScript
CategoryAI Tool
LicenseMIT
Quality Score69/100
Open Issues2
Last Updated2026-09-21
Created2026-09-20
Platformsbrowser, node
Est. Tokens~6k

About open-jev

open-jev is a browser-focused TypeScript library for typed decisions: one piece of text (the state) plus any number of typed questions go in, and one forward pass returns a calibrated probability distribution per question. Nothing is generated, so an answer is always one of the options you provided.

open-jev alternative? Top 2 similar tools

Looking for a open-jev alternative? If you're comparing open-jev with other ai tool tools, these 2 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.

  • claude-code-voice-skill by abracadabra50 · ⭐ 169

    Skill to talk to Claude about your projects over the phone

  • maui-skills by davidortinau · ⭐ 163

    .NET MAUI skills for GitHub Copilot and Claude Code

More AI Tool Tools

Explore other popular ai tool tools:

View all AI Tool tools →

Popular TypeScript Agent Tools

How this security grade is produced

Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.

The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.

Sources & who's responsible:

View on GitHub → Browse AI Tool tools