by nota-america · MCP Server · ★ 84
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
None of the 42 rules matched — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against 42 published rules built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
The quality score combines nine heuristic checks of the repo and its README: completeness, clarity, specificity, examples, structure, agent readiness, step-by-step content, instruction quality and security notes. It rates how well the project explains itself to an agent, not the code.
| Stars | 84 |
| Forks | 5 |
| Language | TypeScript |
| Category | MCP Server |
| License | Apache-2.0 |
| Quality Score | 66/100 |
| Open Issues | 3 |
| Last Updated | 2026-09-23 |
| Created | 2026-03-18 |
| Platforms | claude-code, codex, mcp, node |
| Est. Tokens | ~17k |
Open catalog of cross-platform agent profiles Website | Documentation | Quick Start | Browse Profiles | Request a Profile [](https://www.npmjs.com/packa
Looking for a forgecat-agent-profiles alternative? If you're comparing forgecat-agent-profiles with other mcp server tools, these 6 projects are the closest alternatives on Agent Skills Hub — ranked by topic overlap, star count, and community traction.
103 ready-to-use AI agent skills for Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Windsurf,
Agent Skills and a Claude Code plugin for building, testing, and shipping voice agents with LiveKit
Opinionated AI coding agent and dev environment automation for macOS
Portable SKILLs workspace for Claude Code, Codex, and Gemini — issue-driven workflows and cross-agent collabor
Bring Agent Skills to Any AI Agent and Coding Agent — via CLI or MCP. Manage once, serve anywhere.
An opinionated, AI-native development workflow for Java Enterprise — reusable Skills, Agents, Commands, and MC
Explore other popular mcp server tools:
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy: 42 published rules, covering credential harvesting, data exfiltration, curl | sh installers and more. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: