No red flags found in any of the 11 categories — no credential harvesting, no data exfiltration, no curl-pipe-shell installer. Scanned against the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, refreshed every 8 hours. Full audit →
by openilink · Agent Tool · ★ 1.6k
Last updated: · Indexed by AgentSkillsHub · Auto-synced every 8h
🔒 Is openilink-hub safe to install? View the security audit →
微信 ClawBot iLink 协议的开源消息管理平台 + App 应用市场 Open-source message management platform + App Marketplace for WeChat ClawBot (iLink protocol) 扫码绑定微信号,通过应用市场一键扩展能力 —— 飞书 / Slack / Discord / GitHub / Notion 等 20+ App,装上就用 多 Bot 管理 · 20+ App · 平台互通 · 效率工具 · 生活助手 · AI Tools · 7 种语言 SDK · Passkey 登录 [
WeChat-to-Codex bridge for running Codex app-server from chat, with threads, slash commands, approvals, agents
Explore other popular agent tool tools:
openilink-hub is 开源微信 Bot 管理平台 + App 应用市场 | Self-hosted WeChat Bot Platform with App Marketplace | Lark · Slack · Discord · DingTalk · GitHub · Notion · 20+ Apps | AI Tools | 7 Language SDKs. It is categorized as a Agent Tool with 1.6k GitHub stars.
openilink-hub is primarily written in Go. It covers topics such as ai-chatbot, ai-tools, app-marketplace.
You can find installation instructions and usage details in the openilink-hub GitHub repository at github.com/openilink/openilink-hub. The project has 1.6k stars and 140 forks, indicating an active community.
openilink-hub is released under the MIT license, making it free to use and modify according to the license terms.
The top alternatives to openilink-hub on Agent Skills Hub include hermesclaw, golembot, versus-incident. Each offers a different approach to the same problem space — compare them side-by-side by stars, quality score, and community activity.
Grades come from a rule-based scan built on the SlowMist agent-security taxonomy, covering 11 red-flag categories including credential harvesting, data exfiltration, and curl | sh installers. It is a first-layer scan, not a manual audit — we say so rather than overstate it.
The scale of the problem is documented independently: Liu et al. (2026), in a study of 31,132 agent skills, report that 26.1% contain security vulnerabilities. Our own full-catalog census is published as a citable open dataset.
Sources & who's responsible: